
Larry D wrote:John you gotta cut Joe some slack. He still has burns from his spiffy new apron straps.
MorrisM wrote:Brad C wrote:OutCast wrote:I have a Husky 3120 Rancher (chainsaw) with a 36 inch blade and that tree would still be serious work. A team will be a couple of hours on that bad boy.
The big tree may be best done as a separate project on Sunday. We could get Outcast together with Steve K. with their big saws and clear the trail.
The great big tree up near the greenline may need to be a similar group project with the big saws.
I vote for BIG saws. I can help on Sunday.
Understandable and good point,But would a 3' ride-over be an issue? If someone sues over that on a mtb trail then thats just stupid. Mtbing is an action sport. Would maybe some ride at your own risk signs at the entrances be an issue? How do other trails go about having obstacles? if there is clearly 2 ways to go and you choose to take the harder route and hurt yourself then that should be your own fault.Not a lawyer but theres gotta be a way to include every skill level,legally,in a trail system. Out of all the local trails we don't have hardly anything for the rider that enjoys riding obstacles or jumps,that needs to change. It doesn't even have to be WRT, I enjoy building and riding those kinds of stuff as well as alot of others, but there is nowhere to do it. I would happily go build anywhere I was given permission,and would fund my own projects with my own hard earned money,Just need the place.Brad C wrote:Keep in mind there is a big difference between the public trails and the BMX track. The BMX association leases that space from the park. They pay rent. That is why they have a lock on the gate. Anyone who goes in there has to climb the fence and under the law is trespassing. That makes a big difference in liability issues.
And by the way, even discussing building obstacles on this forum automatically involves MSTA. Any first year law student would get an injunction to have our internet host freeze the forum so entries could not be deleted. My computer would probably be seized for evidence too.
We have way too many lawyers.
Brad C wrote:Dan, thanks for taking care of the bookkeeping on the WRT clearing.
dantheman wrote:Understandable and good point,But would a 3' ride-over be an issue? If someone sues over that on a mtb trail then thats just stupid. Mtbing is an action sport. Would maybe some ride at your own risk signs at the entrances be an issue? How do other trails go about having obstacles? if there is clearly 2 ways to go and you choose to take the harder route and hurt yourself then that should be your own fault.Not a lawyer but theres gotta be a way to include every skill level,legally,in a trail system. Out of all the local trails we don't have hardly anything for the rider that enjoys riding obstacles or jumps,that needs to change. It doesn't even have to be WRT, I enjoy building and riding those kinds of stuff as well as alot of others, but there is nowhere to do it. I would happily go build anywhere I was given permission,and would fund my own projects with my own hard earned money,Just need the place.
After reading this I know what your gonna say,Brad,''Its not really a MTB trail'' so I rest my case. I have a dream that there can be an awesome,flowy trail with skinny's,jumps,berms and speed all in one within 15 minutes from anyone in Memphis that wants to ride it!... That would be the shiznet for sure!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests